N or M? – Agatha Christie

(HarperCollins 2006, in ‘1940s Omnibus’; originally published 1941)

This is the third of the five books featuring Christie’s husband-and-wife detective team, Tommy and Tuppence (really Prudence) Beresford. It’s the early days of the Second World War, and both Beresfords, who served in the first war and later worked for Intelligence (as told in The Secret Adversary and in Partners in Crime), are feeling down-hearted that their country doesn’t seem to want them to serve in any capacity, whereas their two children, Deborah and Derek, are both in uniform. One evening, a Mr Grant, a colleague of the their former boss in Intelligence, Mr Carter, visits to put a proposition to Tommy – the task of trying to find one or two German agents – N or M – who act as fifth-columnists. Tommy is directed to keep his destination a secret, even from his wife, and starts off shortly, ostensibly to Scotland. When he finally reaches his ultimate destination, a boarding house, Sans Souci, in Leahampton, he finds Tuppence already installed as Mrs Blenkensop!

There is a whole bunch of suspicious characters in residence at the boarding house, not least Mrs Perenna, the proprietor, who is Irish and has a grudge against the British, as well as Carl von Deinem, a young German doing important chemical work at a local factory, but who is under suspicion. The characters are sharply written, from Sheila Perenna, unhappily in love with von Deinem, to hypochondriac Mr Cayley and his devoted wife.

Tommy and Tuppence are delightful characters even if you haven’t read about them in their previous adventures: light-hearted yet determined, and intelligent. Their relationship is touching, too: there’s a lovely bit where Deborah comments on her mother’s duplicity in pretending to be staying with an aged aunt whilst she’s elsewhere tracking down Nazi agents, and reacts with horrified disbelief at the thought that she’s gone off with another man:

Deborah’s gaze, from being plaintive, became suddenly wrathful.

‘If you think Mother’s just gone off weekending with someone you’re absolutely wrong. Absolutely. Mother and Father are devoted to each other – really devoted. It’s quite a joke in the family. She’d never – ‘

Tony said hastily: ‘Of course not. Sorry. I really didn’t mean – ‘


The mystery is intriguing, too, with the two of them gradually tracking down both enemy agents, one a man and the other a woman. They aren’t like Poirot, with his super-sleuth tendencies, being ordinarily intelligent – though Christie does play cleverly with the narrative to increase the tension at certain point when she makes the reader think that her characters are walking into danger.

While available as stand-alone books (as the illustration above), my copy is in an omnibus with other ‘stand-alone’ novels which Christie published in the 1940s. N or M? is the one which most closely deals with wartime conditions, since the remaining two published during the war years (in 1944 and 1945) barely reference the war, if at all, and may well have been set in the pre-war years. These two, Towards Zero, and Sparkling Cyanide, will be reviewed shortly.

This entry was posted in Crime fiction, Fiction, Re-read, Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to N or M? – Agatha Christie

  1. Jenny says:

    It has been a looooong time since I read a Tommy & Tuppence mystery. I was never wild about the ones I did read (which I think included this one), so I don’t seek them out. Maybe I should give them another try.

    • Ela says:

      I wasn’t much of a fan when I read them as a teenager, but now I like the way they grow realistically older through the five books, without really changing their essential characteristics. I’m very fond of them both!

  2. Niranjana says:

    I like the short stories best–they’re so frothy and light-hearted that they rank amongst my favorite comfort reads. And there’s all that romance! And the memorable Alfred!

    • Ela says:

      Yes, they are fun – they’re such a lovely couple! I do like Christie’s short stories – some of them are very inventive, and very clever. I think she’s a much underrated writer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s